Andrew sullivan naked-Andrew Sullivan Is Being Smug And Naive | The American Conservative

Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Andrew sullivan naked

Andrew sullivan naked

Andrew sullivan naked

Andrew sullivan naked

Several reputable political blogs including Politico and Mediaite have characterized Sullivan as "obsessed" with Sarah Palin? The president must have the ability to speak candidly with foreign leaders, and his conversations should not be available to anyone outside the Executive branch. In suklivan end, rebecca, I must say that Andrew sullivan naked think that outing public figures is, at worst and I think it's no small allegation User did the same with David Brock. I give his own words and don't put my take on them. Few blogs make money, though, since advertisers are leery of the Web and no one seems willing to pay to read anything on it.

Teenage interracial stories. Navigation menu

What were they experiencing, if not nakfd levels of boredom? But the world I rejoined seemed to conspire to take Andrew sullivan naked space away from me. Only a Sarah Palin reference is missing. I was raised Catholic, was fiercely pro-life at one point but gradually came to the pro-choice perspective. Bush era. The breakthrough came suddenly. Archived from the original on 6 January Archived from nakef original on 27 July This would be, in some ways, the worst choice. He started a political blog inand eventually moved his blog to various publishing platforms, including TimeThe AtlanticThe Daily Beast Massive boob site, and finally an independent subscription-based format. Archived from the original on 10 February It was too heavy a lift — for right now. God bless you! Ross Douthat and Tyler Cowen have suggested that Sullivan is the most influential political writer of his generation, particularly because of his very early and strident support for same-sex marriagehis early political blog, his support of the Iraq Andrew sullivan nakedand his subsequent support of Barack Obama 's presidential candidacy.

Send a question or comment using the form below.

  • We have no reliable figures on just how many priests in the Catholic Church are gay.
  • We met at 3am, at the Black Party in New York.
  • Sullivan is a conservative political commentator, a former editor of The New Republic , and the author or editor of six books.
  • I remember one of the first TV debates I had on the then-strange question of civil marriage for gay couples.
  • An endless bombardment of news and gossip and images has rendered us manic information addicts.

I removed the "nuetrality of this article is disputed" label left by 4. Because, really, the neutrality of this article hasn't been disputed--apparently not even by him! Not one posting was added to this page, let alone one which accused the article of a non-NPOV. If he wants that label added, let him contest it here. User did the same with David Brock. Ex1le , 18 Jun UTC.

I'm changing it back; I have no idea if it is true that AS disagrees with "other conservatives" on a greater number of occasions than he does with "liberals" and I seriously doubt if this could be quantified. This statement provides no additional information and is simply POV-pushing; it is enough to note that he often has disagreements with other notable conservatives Bdrasin , 12 November UTC.

I am changing it back. Sullivan's argument is that they are "true conservative values. The user may be right that they are simply Sullivan's conception but this is a statement about what he is arguing and therefore should represent what he is generally saying even if he is wrong.

Master shepherd , 10 December UTC. Sullivan, in Wikipedia, has provoked many contributors as to "if he is, or 'if he is not" a "conservative", thus making many deltas here to the original body and text.

The definition in politics of "conservatism", in my opinion, should be left to the individual, claiming to be of any political persuation. Andrew Sullivan considers himself a conservative, and has dedicated a lot of his time, by his own definition, of what the meaning should be.

I think the fact that he has recently written a book on the subject qualifies him to be what "he is" here. Pardon, but if other contributors , making comments, care to spend several years of their time writing a book on the subject, and have it published by Simon and Schuster, Putnam, Random House, Harper-Collins, or any other major publishers, may then have the right to dispute whether Mr. Sullivan, again, "is or is not", by his own definition, a "conservative". I thought the way the article addressed the Sullivan sex scandal was written from an anti-Sullivan POV.

I've rewritten that content to be, I hope, closer to NPOV -- I've tried to describe the positions of both sides of the debate. I removed the David Brock quote because I don't think it added to the article, and was very clearly biased against Sullivan.

I felt it was better to summarize the arguments of the anti-Sullivan camp. Neilc , 2 Sep UTC. Response: I think the above was a very good idea.

I do feel that the portion of this entry, "the sex scandle", although being public knowledge, is far too long and in depth relative to the rest of the article about Mr. Although it may be relevant, it takes up nearly one-third of this article, and I personally feel until more information can be written on Mr. Sullivan to reduce this ratio, this currently seems an excessive ratio of "bad to good" information, albeit relevant and important to include.

I hope someone else has a concern here as well. Ok, I'm an amateur wikipedian, so I hope this gets read and taken seriously I'm a big fan of Sullivan. He was crucified for his actions by a malicious jerk whose only claim to fame seems to be The Sex Scandal.

For a man whose early career is predicated upon pushing monogamy and implied, if not explicit, condemnation of homosexual promiscuity as well as an idealized view of gay marriage, to be found trolling for sex online is not a "small thing", and its not unimportant in the face of that man's career. It calls into question the legitimacy of much of the things Sullivan preached If gay marriage's biggest proponent can't even make a stab at the ideals of marriage, do homosexuals really deserve it?

Fallacious arguements? To remove this rather embarassing blemish from the article is to ignore something that greatly influences the population's ability to stomach Sullivan and everything he teachers.

Sullivan's scandal is essential to an understanding of him and how his beliefs are received Does the sex scandal eclipse a lot of the rest of Sullivan's article? Probably does, but I'm not comfortable with the removal of vital facts simply because those facts, taken without additional context, present an unpleasant view of their subject. Mention he was a gap model. Mention his obsession with barebacking see his highlighting its presence in Brokeback Mountain, as if the action at the time the film took place had the same cannotations as the action in modern times , mention his desire to see a "post gay" culture, his introduction of Charles Murray and possibly speculation about what this means if rumors about his preferences for sexual partners of certain races are to be believed Content in italics removed.

Neilc , 25 Jan UTC. Andrew is described as Anglo-American, yet his bio states that he was born in England. Does Andrew have American citizenship? Netsrik 31 Jan I know he voted in the last election, so he has to be a citizen.

I restored "Anglo-American" to the article. Dave , Mar 14, UTC. And how do you know this? PL, 5 Oct So I am — that is the situation. I'll start doing major revisions when I have time. Can anyone else pitch in? He's a relatively important figure and deserves much better than this. Dave , Mar 24, UTC. Dynzmoar 21 March I think the major unanswered question is why Sullivan is identified as conservative.

I'd like to know his stand on a host of issues, say, each plank of the Republican platform, before I would call him conservative.

And, of course, conservatism isn't easily defined. It's been more than a month and no one has provided these. Please do so.

I don't want to take out this stuff if it's true. Dave talk , May 6, UTC. A lot of this is in a Vanity Fair article from or so; can't remember the exact month but the author is or was Marjorie Williams. It uses the primary material ie. Sullivan's blog to convince the reader that Sullivan incorrectly criticizes the Pope without providing any 3rd party critics of Sullivan. Additionally, it contains many POV assertions 'near defamatory', 'rhetorical excess'.

Well, I fixed it. I included several articles from Catholic writers and took out the adjectives so that it would be as neutral as I could make it. I give his own words and don't put my take on them. I then refer to other sources, both magazines and blogs, and do not put my descriptions there either. How tiresome. Did you seek to help me out?

Did you seek to tell me what is needed? You just whip out your "delete" gun and go at it. Wake up and smell the coffee, Honey. And, btw, NONE of those things cites were out of context.

I didn't make him out to be "hysterically anti-Catholic. The pope, you know, the guy in Rome. Sullivan is NOT anti-Catholic. Those attributions to him were all correct and none was out of context. Did you even check? Somehow, I guess you don't care. This is fucking bullshit. I will never contribute to Wikipedia again.

You run it like a gulag. Let me know when and at what time Sullivan wrote to let you know how displeased he was. Andrew Sullivan is not a conservative. At best you could call him a neoconservative, despite some of the differences he's had with them. But, regardless, he's a socially liberal follower of Leo Strauss, and a gay activist, which makes him a neoconservative at best.

More accurately, he's probably a neoliberal or a libertarian. It is an insult to real conservatives to call Andrew Sullivan a conservative. It is not clear to me that Sullivan has endorsed Obama. Please provide a citation. I do not think he has endorsed Obama yet, though he has been extremely supportive. I do not think that Sullivan has endorsed Paul for the presidency, just for the REpublican nomination. He has endorsed him for the Republican ticket.

My impression is that at this point he is endorsing his favorite democrat and republican and will decide between the two. You are correct SineBot.

The judge rejected the Republican argument that the House had to formally authorize an inquiry before it could begin. Last night. Only 10 students invited to Trump's speech at historically black college. It was the moment when Patrick and Chris and I first truly bonded as a team. Since our earliest evolution, humans have been unusually passionate about gossip, which some attribute to the need to stay abreast of news among friends and family as our social networks expanded. The Sabbath — the Jewish institution co-opted by Christianity — was a collective imposition of relative silence, a moment of calm to reflect on our lives under the light of eternity.

Andrew sullivan naked

Andrew sullivan naked. PICS: The world’s 10 best gay nude beaches

The way we read, however impressive, is only a the barest outline of the vision in my head. It was too heavy a lift — for right now. Parts of that economic model can and should be applied elsewhere at a grander scale. The same goes for most of our editorial model.

If you have an idea where that might be, or if you simply want to talk, you can still contact me at patrick andrewsullivan. If you want to contact any of them, please email staff andrewsullivan.

It has been my great honor to have worked with them, and for you, for the better part of a decade. Your wedding , plain and simple. The photos, the setting, the dogs, the look in your faces:. As native Texan gays, we hope our day comes for true marriage, not just a ceremony. My favorite moment of Dishness?

No question: Dusty. We miss you. It gets to me every time I read it — the peculiarities that define us all pets too , the process of moving on but not forgetting , and everything that comes with sharing your life with another being. My mind immediately jumped to the moment you got your green card.

You explained exactly just what and how much the symbolic welcoming to the country meant to you. Thanks for everything. Another simply sends this video, which any true Dishhead will recognize by its date — June 19, So many moments with the Dish brought me joy, tears, enlightenment and shared frustration, but what stands out the most was the Green Revolution coverage. It was the moment when Patrick and Chris and I first truly bonded as a team. Yeah, I set up a script to take screenshots at intervals throughout the interview process.

Super creepy, but I had to memorialize the event because it was a huge fucking deal to me. The chance to work with the three of you was amazing, but this is my moment of Dishness for so many more reasons.

Because this was the moment I began to fully understand that the Dish , in so many ways, was exactly what it presented itself as.

It was not just Andrew; it was a fascinating and bizarre entity all of its own by the time I joined , in which you could see the individual personalities at work, but that was simultaneously so much more than any of you individually. And it was the beginning of one of the most interesting adventures in my life.

The padawans had supplanted their master. The video had like views before being featured at the Dish. No other site comes close in casting such a wide net for the oddities that speak to what we love in our culture. My favorite moment? And when you quoted me praising you for it!

Seriously, how did working for free become OK? I blame Reagan firing the air traffic controllers. So thanks for paying the interns. Thanks for your countless emails over the years — emails that were often more compelling than anything we wrote:. I was raised Catholic, was fiercely pro-life at one point but gradually came to the pro-choice perspective.

When I read those searing stories of choices no parent could face, I finally understood. The Cannabis Closet. And that thread goes so far beyond politics. I picked this because you were so unafraid to tackle it, and your readers followed your lead. You calmed down eventually, and as predicted, we got another four years. Take care during this next stage Andrew :.

I freaked out in real time before any spin occurred. At a time when many observers made a point of showing restraint, you understood viscerally that the situation called for something else. Reading the Melville poem you posted on September 13th, sent a chill through my spine that day.

How foreboding it seemed then, and how prescient it turned out to be. Perhaps it should be a warning to the very people baring it. My favorite moment was the time you finally realized and admitted how wrong you were about the Iraq War.

Those of us who had been against the war from the beginning were being told, by you, and others, how wrong, stupid, etc. I was never prouder of you than I was at that moment. If all of us could be so open to change. Back to Dishness:. I have a clear favorite. I worked on the Obama campaign at this office in Virginia during the general election. Seeing our own tiny corner of the campaign documented amidst your reporting of important events from all over the country on that historic day provided a sense of validation and connection with the larger campaign that I still savor to this day.

This entry has to be one of my all-time favorites in Dishness:. I read it as I was in the middle of drinking my morning caffeine. I literally spat out my drink and started choking because I was laughing so hard. In the end, it has to be the subject that brought me here in the first place: Trig. Despite the ridicule, dismissal and disinterest, you never wavered in your insistence that the story mattered.

In the end, this story is not about Palin. On election night, I was too busy and too drunk to read blogs, so I read this post hung-over on November 7, going to the campaign office to pack my things. It was a beautiful winter morning, cold and clear and sunny.

November 6, : Karl Rove impotently raging against the forces of reality while trying to figure out how he could have spent so much money for so little gain. Oh, so many. I honestly hope that the President has used the line. Maybe when the networks called the election he was never supposed to win. Meep, meep. The Post-Scrotum Compromise. That time when you and Goldblog got into a pissing contest — not about settlements, not about Netanyahu, not about your marks on the Anne Frank attic test, not about Iran … but about that shitty Atlantic redesign.

It took almost a week for him to crawl out of his smoldering in-tray, white flag in hand. For a Moment of Dishness, I nominate your coverage when the Senate torture report came out. Iraq should have taught me your capacity for tunnel-vision, but it took Sally Ride to really cement it for me. Even when you fail. Maybe especially then. Well, I could easily be wrong, but I have a feeling Cheney will crush Edwards tonight.

Yes, I do think that Cheney is way sexier than Edwards. Not that you asked or anything. The butt-scratch mea culpa. Happy trails! I must have emailed 10 seconds after that post hit the blog, and you actually responded directly to me. You knew the kind of trouble you were in. As someone who is young, queer, liberal, and growing up in San Francisco, this piece was the first one to push me to shed my dogmatic approach to those who disagreed with me. This was such an important lesson for me to learn at the time I did I was 17 and incredibly self centered, as 17 year olds are want to do.

During the clusterfuck known as gamergate, you took the time to try to understand the perspective of the nerds who felt their culture was being co- opted. Male nerds are afraid of women, and for good reason. Thanks for trying to understand this. As a product of conservative evangelicalism, it was a growing-up moment for me. It was almost a throwaway line from several years ago.

That, more than any other post, changed my thinking. I had already begun to respect gays more — including coming around on gay marriage — thanks to you. But this was a new perspective: It completely sidestepped the issue of sexuality or race, or religion, to be honest. And vice versa. One of them was to guess the city correctly in a VFYW contest.

That week, the same week I signed up to be a subscriber, by pure fluke, I won the contest. I was so happy I screamed and jumped around the room. In my case it was because I recognized a tree I have never seen , growing in a place I have never been. I knew that tree because I dwell in the overlooked world of garden bloggers and followed the blog of the person who submitted the window view from her Airstream Land Yacht. Urban views tend to get favored over nature views.

I submitted another one just in case. Five days later there it was. It felt good. How many phallic window views did you get? I call it Creation. From the destruction of two colliding spirals something new is born.

Something new is being born right now for all of you with the end of the Dish. Thank you, Andrew and team. Not my window, but my hometown. Although I no longer live there, I felt a connection to someone in Podunk Chetek that we share an even larger, virtual community.

Thank you. Another reader switches gears:. My favorite moment of the Dish was your review of the opening ceremony of the London Olympics, and your comparison to the Beijing ceremony. It perfectly encapsulated what was so great about you and the Dish: a real-time introspective review of real world events.

Peep her vids here. Another reader:. My favorite moment of Dishness: when Andrew had his beard dyed and instead of a subtle grecian formula type of deal, it came out a deep brownish hue. His freakout made me laugh out loud. Exposing himself and poking fun of his own foibles and vanity made the Dish much more fun.

Favorite moment of Dishness? Probably hard to call such a sad video a favorite moment, but years later it stays with me:. It touches on many Dish themes: dogs, faith, addiction, love, redemption, city living. And it just breaks my heart. I felt a fraction of this sadness upon reading about the end of the Dish. This issue is so important, so tied up to the major questions of war and peace — now of course with Iran.

Have you never fantasized about fucking a carpenter with sawdust under his fingernails just after he fixed your creaking door? SullyTMI: I pulled that one off in real life in And then the symbols: you and Aaron as a married couple attending an Obama-hosted diplomatic function, guested by a prime minister a fellow Oxonian who was fully supportive of gay rights in the UK.

A totally exclusive event that you made totally inclusive. May his eternal repose be both spicy and mild. This particular part of the thread just had me laughing as hard as I did the first time. Shits of this nature will often be accompanied by a mid-level whooshing sound which is the reason for the name.

Is this thread an all-time low or all-time high for The Dish? Seriously changed my life. They come out like large, clean, perfectly formed rabbit poops, leaving nothing but white on your toilet paper.

One of the lesser hats you wear is defender of Washington, D. Another fave moment:. When Sam Harris kicked your ass in the God debate. Thanks for that, and for everything else I learned in the many, many hours I spent reading your blog.

Using your term gave me an alternative that made conversations about politics easier and clearer, especially amongst my primarily Jewish and atheist colleagues. After I started using the term in conversation, a friend with a similar year Catholic background offered her profound thanks to me — so I pass those along to you as well.

If you were gay and young in the s, the pop music was a form of emancipation and revelation. Many of us as teens lived in small towns and yearned for the big city. The video is a record of the beginnings of a revolution. You can feel it coming. Ridiculous comparison of course, but with both Dish and Hitch I felt as though I communed a little with each. Gah so many. Many of them have been very long, the kind of email that starts at words and then I whittle it back as far as I can.

This one was not :. Only a Sarah Palin reference is missing. Thanks for a huge fix before utter withdrawal. I took great satisfaction when I took up the cause to have the Dish feature the poetry of William Stafford.

It goes among things that change. People wonder about what you are pursuing. You have to explain about the thread. But it is hard for others to see. Tragedies happen; people get hurt or die; and you suffer and get old. Last night. Wearing the shirt. Balancing the mug between my legs. The dogs not cooperating. Brought tears to all of our eyes my father and two of my three sisters, included , along with a silent and calm reflection on the world to come.

There are so many moments to choose from, Andrew, but you know what the best one is? This one right here. This cultural and moral shift has not only changed the consciousness of most American Catholics 67 percent of whom support civil marriage for gay couples and gay priests many of whom are close to quitting but also broken the silence that long shrouded the subject.

Here we enter into the mystery of the human being. They also triggered near panic on the Catholic right. In increasingly direct ways, they have argued that the root of the scandal was not abuse of power, or pedophilia, or clericalism, or the distortive psychological effects of celibacy and institutional homophobia, but gayness itself.

Bishop Robert Morlino of Wisconsin agreed. It emerged that McCarrick had abused at least two children and then sexually harassed generations of adult seminarians with impunity. Here, it seemed, was a pedophile and an abusive gay man, at the very apex of the church, known to be sexually active with seminarians, protected by his peers, and tolerated for decades by many in the hierarchy, including the last three popes. McCarrick gave the right an opening.

New online media organizations — led by Breitbart-style websites such as LifeSite News and Church Militant — now routinely pounce on any incidents involving gay priests and have an influential audience in the Vatican.

At the center of this struggle, of course, are gay priests, bishops, and cardinals themselves. They are caught in a whiplash of relative toleration embodied by Francis and hostility exemplified by his conservative predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI. The ban on gay priests and seminarians is still in force and, in fact, was affirmed by Francis in As a result, almost all gay priests are closeted, for fear of being targeted or terminated, which makes them uniquely barred from entering the discussion.

Hospital chapels, like those in airports, can be strange places. But on a recent Sunday at noon, in a sprawling hospital on the edges of a midwestern city, the congregation spilled out down the hallways for Mass. The Mass itself was unremarkable apart from a striking homily when the priest talked of the joys of having nothing as the Christmas gifting season loomed.

He told of a moment when he was returning from a field hospital along an unlit path in the early hours of the morning, surrounded by intense suffering on top of brutal poverty, yet he was buoyed by the faith and tenacity of the poorest of the poor, the sickest of the sick. He stopped and looked up into the starlit sky, he said, and felt not despair but hope.

They come from all over. At one point as we spoke the next day in the hospital, he was greeted by a woman who asked for an on-the-spot confession and he shooed me aside; later I met an anguished gay man from an ultra-Catholic family he was counseling; and for a few hours on Sunday morning, he was with the wife and teenage sons of a dying man. Father Mike was the bandage on all of those open wounds.

He has witnessed a couple hundred deaths in his career. One night, he told me, he sat with three patients at the hour of their deaths in quick succession. Mike came from a troubled family, and his abusive parents converted to Catholicism when he was entering his teens.

He agreed to go to Sunday Mass because they promised him brunch at his favorite spot afterward, until, at the age of 15, he formally became a Catholic himself. At 17, he was sent to visit a priest for a one-on-one counseling retreat. But his own priest backed the minister, and, despite testimony from three other boys, the abuser was acquitted.

Despite all this, in the mids he entered seminary after graduating from college. He found himself constantly subjected to psychological evaluations and denied the usual summer assignments. Fearing his teenage testimony against an abuser was blocking his ordination, he quit to become a critical-care nurse.

But he still felt called to the church and eventually tried seminary again. He was ordained three years later. I told him most people would find this story bizarre, masochistic even. It is in that context of nurse to patient, pastor to flock, that today he manages his conflicts as a gay priest. Most of the gay priests I spoke with have never experienced abuse in the church. Many had already come to terms with their sexual orientation before they entered the priesthood, but some wrestled with it in the seminary, and others later in life.

But I had people in charge of me who challenged me to ask myself if this were authentic, and I felt that this was the life and work that God was calling me to.

You need to accept yourself. In college, Andrew sought out more treatment, and then, suddenly, his father died. It threw him. I had started praying again and attending Mass. It was there that Andrew had his first adult sexual experience.

I came out as bisexual. The breakthrough came suddenly. It has become a double stigma: targeted by the hierarchy for being gay and by the general public for being pedophiles.

Many of the people I spoke to, Catholics and non-Catholics, about the subject of gay priests rolled their eyes and asked about the abuse of children. The news environment is saturated with stories about sex abuse — and rightly so — yet there are hardly any public examples of the overwhelming number of gay priests who would never dream of preying upon the powerless.

Many good gay priests, of course, fail from time to time, breaking celibacy in consensual adult affairs or trysts. They are not saints. But this is true of straight priests as well. These men are still sexual beings, flesh and blood. In these crises, they tend to do one of two things: either fall so deeply in love that they cannot sustain a life without physical intimacy and so leave the church or, more often, recalibrate, confess, and recommit to the celibate life.

Father Joe spoke poignantly of falling in love. It was my last relationship. I asked if we could have a friendship that was also sexual, and he said no. My lapses these days are watching porn in my bedroom. How do you live a healthy sexuality in a context where your sexuality is stigmatized? The preponderance of gay men in the priesthood is, in fact, nothing new in the history of the church.

For well over a millennium, it was commonplace, and though there were occasional denunciations of it, these were usually followed by papal inaction or indifference. Even Saint Augustine had one particularly intense love affair with another young man.

As was the case in convents as well. The gifts that lesbians have brought to the church are just as extraordinary, but because the priesthood is exclusively male and women are kept from positions of real power, lesbian nuns are, for better or worse, not caught up in this specific crisis.

He had had sexual relationships with men in his younger years, but, vowing chastity as a monk, he sublimated these desires into an idea of intense celibate love for another man. Francis and Leo IX would agree across the centuries. Damian was a leading reformer of the church in his day, far beyond the gay-priest issue, and a synod in responded to all of his many proposals — except the one against gay clergy.

Instead, Alexander locked it up! Homosexuals, in the new theology, were part of nature — many had noticed homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom, particularly among hares and hyenas — but they were also somehow contrary to nature. Aquinas never resolved this paradox. Neither has the church. As the taboo deepened in the succeeding centuries, there is little reason to believe that gay priests disappeared, but most went more fully underground. Still, same-sex love remained a profound part of Catholic Christianity.

Ignatius sent Francis to evangelize Asia, and their long separation was a source of suffering for both. God knows the profound impression that those words of great love made on my soul.

The greatest Catholic theologian of the 19th century, Cardinal John Henry Newman, devoted his personal life to another man, Ambrose St. This does not mean the two had a sexual relationship although they might have , but it does suggest that deep same-sex love was still alive in the highest echelons of the Catholic priesthood, even at the apex of Victorian repression and even in someone about to be celebrated as a saint.

When St. Newman famously converted from Anglicanism to Catholicism and was part of the reformist and aesthetic Oxford Movement, which was strongly influenced by homosexual men. The greatest Catholic poet of the 19th century, the Jesuit priest Gerard Manley Hopkins, was gay; one of the deepest theologian-priests of the last century, Henri Nouwen, was as well.

Both suffered bouts of deep depression. But why is the priesthood so gay? It is worth noting that the connection between homosexuality and spirituality is by no means restricted to Catholicism. Some evolutionary psychologists have found an ancient link between gay men and tribal shamanism.

Among gay priests themselves, I heard a variety of explanations. Others explained that they were drawn to the ritual of the church. Catholicism is a faith centered on the Mass, where the body and the soul and the senses are as important as the mind. The Mass is, in some ways, a performance. These types — also found in the arts and scholarship — are sticklers for detail, ruthless about rules, and attuned to tradition and beauty. In many ways, the old, elaborate High Mass, with its incense and processions, color-coded vestments, liturgical complexity, musical precision, choirs, organs, and sheer drama, is obviously , in part, a creation of the gay priesthood.

Their sexuality was sublimated in a way that became integral and essential to Catholic worship. Then there is the common experience of a gay boy or teen, brought up in the church, who turns to God in struggling with the question of his difference and displacement from the normal. He is forced to ponder deeper questions than most of his peers, acquires powerful skills of observation, and develops a precocious spirituality that never fully leaves him. This resonates for myself as a Catholic boy and teen.

The first person I ever came out to was God, in a silent prayer on my way to Communion. Like many solitary gay Catholic boys, I saw in Jesus a model — single, sensitive, outside a family, marginalized and persecuted but ultimately vindicated and forever alive.

But there are other reasons for gay men to seek the priesthood that are far from healthy. The first is celibacy. If you were a young gay Catholic in centuries past, one way to avoid social ostracism, or constant questions about why you lacked an interest in girls or women, was to become a priest.

This pattern, though much less severe than in the past, endures. I will become a magisterial personality. Often, this unconscious struggle breaks down. It is simply too difficult not to be oneself. Some cope through absurd flamboyance and high camp; others sink into depression.

Alcoholism and addiction take over. They had been such athletes when they were young. And then I had a meltdown. It was one of those moments of wanting something to happen with a friend. One evening, when I left his place, I realized I really wanted to have a relationship with this guy.

Then it came flowing out of me. Other gay priests, more self-aware and cynical, find there is a career to be made in all of this falseness.

Everything was suppressed, no questions were asked in seminaries, and psychological counseling was absent and even now is rare. Scarred, scared men became priests, and certain distinct patterns emerged.

One, as we have come to learn, was sexual acting out and abuse. To conflate sexual abuse with the gay priesthood, as many now reflexively do, is a grotesque libel on the vast majority who have never contemplated such crimes and are indeed appalled by them.

It is classic scapegoating. At the same time, to decouple the sexual-abuse crisis entirely from the question of gay priests is a willful avoidance of an ugly truth. Pedophilia is a separate category outside the question of sexual orientation. But some abuse of male teens and young adults, as well as abuse of other priests, is clearly related to homosexuality gone horribly astray — and around a quarter of the reported cases involve to year-old victims.

The scale of it in the late 20th century was extraordinary — but, in retrospect, predictable. If you do not deal honestly with your sexuality, it will deal with you. If you construct an institution staffed by repressed and self-hating men and build it on secrecy and complete obedience to superiors, you have practically created a machine for dysfunction and predation. And the hideous truth is we will never know the extent of the abuse in centuries past or what is still going on, especially throughout places in the world like Africa and Latin America where robust scrutiny of the church is still sometimes taboo.

Another pattern was externalized homophobia: What you hate in yourself but cannot face, you police and punish in others. It remains a fact that many of the most homophobic bishops and cardinals have been — and are — gay. Take the most powerful American cardinal of the 20th century, Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York, who died in He had an active gay sex life for years while being one of the most rigid upholders of orthodoxy.

Monsignor Tony Anatrella, an advocate for conversion therapy consulted by the Vatican, was recently suspended for sexual abuse of other men.

Anti-gay archconservative Cardinal George Pell was recently found guilty of sexual abuse of boys in Australia. The founder of the once hugely influential hard-right, anti-gay cult the Legion of Christ, Marcial Maciel, was found to have sexually abused countless men, women, and children.

Benedict XVI has described himself as a bookish boy, averse to sports. But this is because so many in the hierarchy still cannot see homosexuality as being about love and identity rather than acts and lust.

As we uncover layer upon layer of dysfunction at the very top of the church, it may be time to point out how naked these bejeweled emperors can appear.

And this, of course, has added another layer of complexity to the story of gay priests: Generations matter. Those in their 70s and 80s grew up in a different universe, where the closet was automatic and the notion of even discussing gay priests was scandalous. But their reaction to the modern reexamination of homosexual love, and the consideration of sex as distinct from procreation, was panicked retrenchment.

Why Are Old Men Always Naked In The Locker Room? Ctd – The Dish

Like any religion, wokeness understands the need to convert children. The school did not inform parents of this, of course:. Parents only heard about it when children started arriving home desperate to get to the bathroom after holding it in all day. Girls told their parents mortifying stories of having a boy kick open their stall door. Boys described being afraid to use the urinals. Authorities impose an ideology onto reality; reality slowly fights back. The question is simply how much damage is done by this kind of utopianism before it crumbles under its own weight.

Simple solutions — like a separate, individual gender-neutral bathroom for the tiny minority with gender dysphoria or anyone else — are out of bounds. They are, after all, reinforcing the idea that girls and boys are different. I spend a lot of my days worried about White boys. This sounds to me as if he is describing, well, boys of any race. Children, in other words, are being taught to think constantly about race, and to feel guilty if they are the wrong one.

And, of course, if they resist, that merely proves the point. Their philosophical origins — an attempt by structuralist French philosophers to rescue what was left of Marxism in the s and s — are generally obscured in any practical context. Like religion, you cannot prove any of its doctrines empirically, but children are being forced into believing them anyway.

The racism, sexism, and condescension in those sentences! The teacher, by the way, is not some outlier. Having taken one form of religion out of the public schools, the social-justice left is now replacing it with the doctrines of intersectionalit y. Last week, I defended drag queens reading stories to kids in libraries. Getting children interested in reading with costumed clowns strikes me as harmless.

In spaces like this, kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where people can present as they wish, where dress up is real. However well-meant, this is indoctrination into an ideology, not campy encouragement for reading and fun. Increasingly, girly boys and tomboys are being told that gender trumps sex, and if a boy is effeminate or bookish or freaked out by team sports, he may actually be a girl, and if a girl is rough and tumble, sporty, and plays with boys, she may actually be a boy.

In the last few years in Western societies, as these notions have spread, the number of children identifying as trans has skyrocketed. In Sweden , the number of kids diagnosed with gender dysphoria, a phenomenon stable and rare for decades, has, from to , increased almost tenfold.

In New Zealand , the rate of girls identifying as boys has quadrupled in the same period of time; in Britain , where one NHS clinic is dedicated to trans kids, there were around a hundred girls being treated in ; by , there were 1, Possibly this sudden surge is a sign of pent-up demand, as trans kids emerge from the shadows, which, of course, is a great and overdue thing.

The suffering of trans kids can be intense and has been ignored for far too long. But one reason to worry about the new explosion in gender dysphoria is that it seems recently to be driven by girls identifying as boys rather than the other way round. Female sexuality is more fluid and complex than male sexuality, so perhaps girls are more susceptible to ideological suggestion, especially when they are also taught that being a woman means being oppressed.

In the case of merely confused or less informed kids, the consequences of treatment can be permanent. The use of these drugs for gender dysphoria is off-label , unapproved by the FDA ; there have been no long-term trials to gauge the safety or effectiveness of them for gender dysphoria, and the evidence we have of the side effects of these drugs in FDA-approved treatment is horrifying.

Among adults, the FDA has received 24, reports of adverse reactions, over half of which it deemed serious. Imagine the toll of making a decision about your child like that? Eighty-five percent of gender-dysphoric children grow out of the condition — and most turn out to be gay. Yes, some are genuinely trans and can and should benefit from treatment.

And social transition is fine. But children cannot know for certain who they are sexually or emotionally until they have matured past puberty. I remember being taunted by some other kids when I was young — they suggested that because I was mildly gender-nonconforming, I must be a girl. If my teachers and parents and doctors had adopted this new ideology, I might never have found the happiness of being gay and comfort in being male. How many gay kids, I wonder, are now being led into permanent physical damage or surgery that may be life-saving for many, but catastrophic for others, who come to realize they made a mistake.

And what are gay adults doing to protect them? Only a few ornery feminists , God bless them, are querying this. In some ways, the extremism of the new transgender ideology also risks becoming homophobic. Instead of seeing effeminate men as one kind of masculinity, as legitimate as any other, transgenderism insists that girliness requires being a biological girl.

Similarly, a tomboy is not allowed to expand the bandwidth of what being female can mean, but must be put into the category of male. Homosexuality in Iran is so anathema that gay boys must be turned into girls , and lesbian girls into boys, to conform to heterosexual norms.

Sound a little too familiar? Many resist; many stay quiet; a few succumb and convert. Children have no such options. Indoctrinate yourselves as much as you want to, guys. But hey, teacher — leave those kids alone. His foam-flecked meltdown on CNN last night was not exactly a sign of confidence in his beleaguered client in the White House.

Roy Cohn would have been a little smoother. What Giuliani admitted — and then tried to deny he admitted — is that he went to Ukraine in order to get the government in Kiev to investigate a potential scandal involving the Bidens. Hey, he got away with it once. Why not twice? All of which casts a whole new and incriminating light on that phone call with the Ukrainian president that an intelligence agent brought to the attention of the authorities via the whistle-blower statute.

Do I believe that Trump is perfectly capable of using his office to lean on a foreign government to expose a political opponent? Well, duh. And do I believe that he and his attorney general will do everything they can to keep this bottled up and away from the congressional oversight it clearly merits and legally requires?

Of course they will. And the worst of it is: They have a point. The trouble in our constitutional system is that a confidential presidential phone conversation with a foreign leader is obviously covered by executive privilege. The president must have the ability to speak candidly with foreign leaders, and his conversations should not be available to anyone outside the Executive branch.

Separation of powers requires that even the Congress be excluded from the details of this kind of discussion. And yet that discussion may well present a real threat to national security, and constitute an impeachable offense. What do we do then? The elevation of a despicable, shameless liar and con artist to the presidency has revealed a core weakness in the U.

Its attribution of executive authority to one individual, the president, gives that individual extraordinary control over the entire government. If that individual is a traitor, a crook, or a pathological liar, too bad. You either impeach him … or he wins. You begin to understand why the Roman republic vested this kind of authority in two men, so that if one were corrupt, the other might correct it.

We have no such system. We have, in effect, a dictator of sorts, and since Trump has no other way of operating, we have slid — perhaps irrevocably — away from liberal democracy toward an elected form of tyranny. The Founders simply assumed that a figure as depraved as Trump would never win an election.

More to the point, his criminality is backed by a solid majority of his own party. Rudy gave Hannity the game plan last night, and from now on, the right-wing media will likely ignore a massive abuse of power and focus on yet another largely incomprehensible conspiracy theory about Biden.

Each time he survives, he moves the baseline. The corruption, profound now, will only intensify. The abuse of power will grow. Each time we fail to hold the tyrant accountable is an opportunity for him to up the ante yet again.

Which is to say there is one obvious remedy for this lawlessness and borderline treason. Madam Speaker, the ball is now in your court. We all knew it would come down to the wire. Hard negotiations are like that. One possible solution: to keep Northern Ireland inside the Customs Union, but leave the rest of the U. Of course, this means that one part of the U. But Northern Ireland is unique. Unlike Wales and Scotland, there is a sea between Ulster and the mainland U. And there are special factors — namely the long internecine, sectarian strife — that render a new, hard land border highly contentious and potentially dangerous.

Surely this could be widened and built on. And this might only be a temporary arrangement, with the Brits doing what they can to see if new technology might construct a virtual border without a physical structure and checkpoints. There is surely a sweet spot there — and both Boris and the E. The E. Having delivered Brexit, Johnson could then call an election. The Tory party as a whole, meanwhile, has a double-digit lead over Labour in the latest poll of polls, and, in some, the Liberal Democrats are neck and neck with Labour.

The Eurocrats are not doing themselves any favors either. Here it is :.

Andrew sullivan naked

Andrew sullivan naked

Andrew sullivan naked